|
Home >
UMTS
Commentary By Leon Perlman
As the first major change to the cdmaOne technology that has been
implemented widely in the U.S. and Asia, it is important that CDMA2000
works. If it does, it could persuade TDMA and even some GSM operators in
North America, China and Latin America to provide a CDMA2000 overlay onto
their existing networks.
This first phase of the CDMA2000 upgrade, variously called 1XRTT, IMT
MC1X, 3G1X, or just plain 1X, is designed to double current voice capacity
and support always-on data transmission speeds ten times faster than those
typically available today-some 153.6 kbit/s on both the forward and reverse
links. Handset standby times should also increase by up to 50 percent.
Users, meanwhile, will be able to benefit from enterprise and consumer
applications that would normally require more bandwidth, including personal
information management, telemetry, corporate intranet access,
videoconferencing, gaming and music on demand.
Voice and data capacity
The increase in voice and data capacity stems inter alia from advances in
modulation algorithms, new IP backbones, and new chipsets that support up to
32 simultaneous users on a single chip, a four-fold increase over the
previous generation.
While the CDMA2000 specification allows for an evolutionary migration to
later advances in CDMA2000 that use core IP networks and voice-over-IP, the
current 1X migration requires relatively modest hardware and software
upgrades to existing cdmaOne infrastructure. Even then, operators can
upgrade to 1X without having to implement it throughout their entire cdmaOne
network, which means they can upgrade certain hotspots that require voice
capacity enhancements or higher data speeds.
This strategy aims to reduce technological risks by phased enhancements
of networks with medium rate data services, and then later evolve to higher
rate data services so as to avoid the uncertainties of return on investment
that currently cloud the UMTS 3G vision. UMTS operators have in many cases
over-extended themselves by paying billions of dollars for 3G spectrum to
provide high-speed data services which the CDMA2000 world believes it can
achieve without the same concomitant costs.
Of course, billions of dollars may well be spent by cdmaOne operators to
introduce CDMA2000 and its later iterations to their customers. But that
money won't (for the most part) be spent on buying spectrum, since CDMA2000
follows an in-band evolution strategy toward 3G based on existing worldwide
cdmaOne band classes and infrastructure. It can thus be deployed in existing
spectrum, overlaying its new feature sets and increased capacity on existing
cdmaOne networks, and using an existing (and paid for) standard 1.25MHz
frequency channel.
Efficiency
CDMA2000 maximizes the efficiency of the existing spectrum and also
recognizes the investments already made, all of which results in significant
benefits to operators. These benefits include enhanced service provision,
greater economies of scale, reduced complexity, reduced time to deployment,
and simplified roaming, while delivering state-of-the art services to
consumers.
Handsets using CDMA2000 technology will also be backward compatible to
existing cdmaOne networks, so current handsets and features will operate
over next generation networks providing continued access both at home and
while roaming. Operators which deploy 3G with 1X will still have roaming
with worldwide CDMA operators on their cdmaOne networks. Dual mode handsets
that allow TDMA/CDMA2000 interoperability may also augment the business case
for a move by TDMA operators to CDMA2000.
The flexible migration from cdmaOne provides for a series of upgrades
leading to CDMA2000's increased voice capacity and megabit data rates,
allowing each operator to upgrade when its individual market requirements
dictate, without having to significantly upgrade infrastructure or purchase
new spectrum. The evolution of the air interface, capability of the core
network (ANSI-41), and spectrum flexibility ensure this.
The business case that dictates the extent of its overlay of their
cdmaOne network will, of course, differ for each carrier. This will depend
on its capex spend and its capabilities, as well as varying degrees of
subscriber differentiation. For some operators, the migration path may never
need to reach the megabit level, while others, especially those in Asia,
have a more immediate need to go as far down the 3G path as possible.
From the operator perspective, there is relatively little effort involved
in upgrading a cdmaOne network to 1X. A 1X upgrade does not require any
hardware 'forklifting', just some tweaking. They will be able to use most of
their existing infrastructure to allow backward compatibility to IS-95
users.
To permit the advanced multimedia services that a 1X implementation
promises, cdmaOne operators will have to do some retrofitting of base
station channel cards with 1X cards, implement software upgrades in specific
areas of their existing networks, and add some new IP-centric boxes to allow
them to implement the data/voice 1X specification in part or in full. The
approach to this will differ in form depending on what vendor equipment has
been chosen, although most vendor approaches include ensuring backward
compatibility with existing base stations with flexible future-proofing
hooks for new technologies like intelligent antennas to boost capacity.
What stays relatively intact in a 1X overlay of a cdmaOne network is the
MSC (mobile switching center), antenna systems, amplifiers, filters, and the
existing data core of IS-95 networks called the IWF (inter working
function). The IWF interfaces to the MSC via a Lambda switch and allows
cdmaOne terminals access to a relatively limited packet data offering of
around 9.6kbit/s. It is retained in a cdmaOne upgrade to 1X to provide this
backward data compatibility. The MSC, though, requires a software upgrade.
At the base station level, new channel cards are required to support the
increased capacity and enhancement in IP provisioning. New radio control
software will also be required in the BS to enable the new channels, and
where appropriate, software upgrades will also be necessary for base station
controllers. Some operators may, however, want to implement separate boxes
in the BSs in parallel with existing cdmaOne cards, primarily for cdmaOne
backwards compatibility, and 1X testing imperatives.
Support
The new software in the BSs and BSCs embody coherent reverse link,
additional Walsh code structures for more channels and capacity and a new
power control scheme, as well as a new paging and synchronization channel
messaging to allow users to speed up access to new data facilities. 1X
upgrades will also support supplemental channel structures if voice and data
are used simultaneously and there is a need to increase capacity of either
at a given time and circumstance.
To complete the 1X data/voice picture, operators will have to add
additional hardware to define a new, comprehensive always-on high-speed
IP-centric environment lacking in cdmaOne networks. Most of the new IP
hardware in 1X systems is, unlike the GPRS world, off-the-shelf and does not
need to be specifically designed or modified to exist in the wireless
universe; this ensures investment protection.
These new components-which will exist in parallel with the IWF-include
the PCF (packet control function) to act as an interface to the MSC and to
the PDSN (packet data service node), another new 1X addition. The PDSN is a
wireless-savvy router that acts as an interface to the internet and
intranets.
Another new addition is the AAA (accounting, authentication and
authorization) node which hangs off the PDSN to provide service profiles of
end-user-specific data for packet data operations. The PCF was designed to
allow the AAA and PDSN to be as off-the-shelf as possible as to ensure
interoperability, and to allow a smooth transition to 3G services.
Soft switches
In later iterations of CDMA2000 1X, so-called 'soft switches' will allow
cdmaOne networks with 1X overlays to carry their voice calls over IP in the
backhaul, rather than the current methodology that uses circuit switching.
TDMA networks wanting to overlay 1X will require, among other things, new
hybrid TDMA/CDMA2000 base stations, new BSC software, new dual mode TDMA/CDMA2000
terminals for users, a new PDSN, and new MSC software along with all the
other components that make up a 1X network. Although the 1X upgrade and
later 1X-EV-DO/DV iterations do not specifically require any increase in
base station numbers, because of the increased fidelity required to maintain
promised QoS speeds on the downlink and uplink, and the need to ensure low
latency for multimedia applications, more BS and BSCs may in fact be
necessary at the edge of the networks where signal to noise (S/N) ratios
impact on data rates.
The necessity for improved amplifier and antenna systems to produce the
required fidelity might also arise in some circumstances, although 1X
promises up to 35 percent improvement in coverage using existing base
stations, filters, amplifiers, and topography. It is anticipated that
operators in densely populated areas will want to get the full benefit of 1X
by upgrading to 1XEV where data demand is high.
Operators will also have to address voice capacity issues with other
technologies like smart antennas and dynamic power control. The increase in
RF capacity with 1X enables more simultaneous users, which means increase in
revenue per cell site and higher return on investment, but also means that
operators will need to mediate between simultaneous higher demand for voice
and data.
The overlay design of 1X and its spectral efficiency protects valuable
voice revenue, as the provision of medium and high rate IP-based services
will not necessarily impact on voice capacity. Operators will have the
flexibility to support this growing demand for voice and data without
allocating bandwidth specifically for data before customer demand requires
it.
Some vendors allow operators to protect their voice revenues by
dedicating capacity to voice, which is usually given the highest priority in
the network. This could also encompass throttling data rates up and down for
users according to demand and specific business models.
Peak, symmetrical data rates of 153.6kbit/s in ideal conditions are
possible, but field trails suggest that, as this is a shared resource,
130kbit/s average aggregate throughput is more likely. This will be shared
by many users, which could decrease available bandwidth to individual users,
much like heavy usage on an office LAN chocks individual demand. However,
since usage scenarios suggest the likelihood of more bursty-type 'surfing'
where all of the available bandwidth is not swallowed up in one gulp by a
few users, fairly high throughputs nearing 130kbit/s are possible for
individual users.
Billing information
The new AAA nodes will also be busy collecting varied types of billing
information, as operators devise new methods of billing for the many new
services anticipated to come on stream as a result of the always-on,
high-speed 1X capabilities.
The paradigm will thus change for pure time-based billing to a
combination of time and data usage. The billing scenarios may include
flat-rate models that bundle talk-and-surf, or billing incorporating tiered
levels of service with premium billing for QoS assurances for data and voice
quality.
These include QoS support via low delay tolerance, data rate guarantee,
and priority service access for multimedia applications. Operators could
offer premium voice quality to certain users at a premium price using V2
voice mode (V1 is standard voice quality). They may also be able to bill for
'hot spot' coverage in convention centers, stadiums, malls and campuses, and
for dedicated data rates and coverage to groups of users.
It is also very likely that they will emulate the Japanese i-mode success
by taking a slice of profits for all micro-transactions successfully
completed over their networks and portals. This in some cases will
necessitate getting a banking partner or even a banking license to allow
users to create and maintain mobile wallets for m-commerce payments on
operator infrastructure. Location-based services are also likely to enhance
operator revenues.
Later iterations of 1X will provide enhancements, such as increased data
rates, radio enhancements of transmit diversity, smart antennas, direct
spread, and multi-carrier, and inter-operation of network protocols. These
include 1X EV-DO, or 1X-EV Phase One, which is a data-only enhancement to
networks. Built primarily upon Qualcomm's High Data Rate (HDR) technology,
it places voice and data on separate channels to provide up to 2.4Mbit/s
access speeds. Operators have to install an incremental carrier in cell
sites to provide these services. There's also the controversial EV-DV, or
1X-EV Phase Two, which promises stratospheric data speeds as high as three
to 5Mbps. It requires a software and digital card upgrade on the existing 1X
network.
1X upgrades will also include implementation of industry standard IOS V4
(version 4) interface to connect to the PDSN, giving wireless operators the
flexibility of selecting the radio frequency (RF) mobile sub-system
independently from the MSC.
The building blocks to 3G have been assembled. CDMA2000 is ready to go.
Now it's time to put the new networks through their paces.
|