|
|
|
|
Home
Brief Details
These two questions deal with the updating of policies on
the use of 3G phones at work and on-call rota systems and the Working Time
Regulations.

If you have a question for the HRG/Croner-i
legal Q&A service then
click here and remember to
place 'legal' in the subject box. The service is for general UK employment
law only.
Question 1
With the increasing spread of 3G phones, it is possible for them to be used
to send images of confidential materials or of other employees, thus
infringing their human rights? I am currently updating our policies to
restrict their use or even ban employees from bringing them into the office.
Where can I find guidance on what is/is not acceptable?
Answer 1
The sending of digital images from 3G mobile phones, and/or the
photographing or filming of fellow employees, customers, visitors or any
member of the public without their consent may breach an individuals’ right
to privacy and could in certain circumstances constitute sexual harassment.
As an organisation you should update your bullying and harassment policies
and mobile phone policies to reflect this and confirm the consequences of
breaching it. Additionally, it may be appropriate to build into your
policies that sending confidential information using these phones is a
potential disciplinary matter. There is, however, no specific legislation in
relation to this.
Question 2
We are currently looking at implementing an on call rota system for our IT
system support team, which would mean that staff would work during the day
between 8.00am to 8.00pm and then 1 member of staff would be required to be
on call during the night, outside normal hours.
There are currently 4 members of staff in the team and we will be looking to
recruit one additional member of staff. The on call rota would fall to 1 in
5. The current staff work shift patterns during the day. I would be grateful
if you could clarify a few issues relating to rest periods:
Having looked at the working time directive, I am correct in assuming that
we may be exempt from the 11 hour rest break rule under regulation 21 part(e).
where the worker's activities are affected by:
(i) an occurrence due to unusual and unforeseeable circumstances, beyond the
control of the worker's employer;
(ii) exceptional events, the consequences of which could not have been
avoided despite the exercise of all due care by the employer;
In addition do we have an obligation under regulation 24 to provide
compensatory rest break, which should be equivalent to the on call duration,
i.e. 1/2 on call then they come in 1/2 hour later?
Answer 2
You are incorrect in assuming that you would fall within the exemption which
deals with unusual and unforeseen circumstances. It is clearly foreseeable
that the IT person would be called upon during the night to rectify any
problems.
I therefore do not consider that there is an exemption which covers your
particular situation and so these employees should be given their daily and
weekly rest periods as outlined in the WTR.
Clearly, if the employee is at home when on call and is able to go about
their normal activities, then only the time spent responding to calls would
count as working time.
You, as the employer, can enter into a workforce agreement with these
employees to modify or exclude the provisions relating to daily rest
periods. The regulations themselves are not clear as to the length of
compensatory rest to be given. The safest approach is to give the whole of
the rest period (i.e. 11 hours for daily rest) but it could be argued that
the amount of compensatory rest need only be given for the time spent
actually responding to calls. Unfortunately, there has as yet been no
guidance on this from the Employment Tribunals.
Paula Matheson, employment consultant, Croner
Disclaimer: although great care has been taken in the compilation and
preparation of the Q&As to ensure accuracy, we cannot in any circumstances
accept responsibility for errors or omissions or advice given within them.
Legal Issues in Mobile
2004
SMS Mobile spam draws US FCC regulator wrath
Verizon Wireless sues SMS spammer
EU Commission challenges
UK international roaming rates
BT and TMobile UK argue over mobile termination rates
Russian mobile revenues to exceed USD 9 billion in 2004
Ofcom to strengthen premium rate services protection
New UK
Regulations
for opting out of PSMS
Consumer group formulates cell phone in-flight policy
Malaysian couple misread text competition details
Legal Q&As - working time and 3G harassment
Switzerland to insist on Prepaid registration
Malaysian couple misread text competition details
Consumer group formulates cell phone in-flight policy
GSM Wireless Nanny Blocker
Launched
UK Mobile Operators Block Online Porn
Finland's
cellphone service watchdog shuts down SMSs from 'God'
Brazilian Government Faces Legal
Action Over Regulator Sacking
2003
Now you can dump your wife by SMS
EU presses for mobile spam and privacy laws
Mobile Phone whilst driving ban commences in the UK
"No
cell phones" sticker now trademarked
Warning That Bluetooth Class I devices pose hacking
& security risk
Anti-spam laws now in force in the UK ban unsolicited SMS
South Korea Clamps Down on SMS Spam
Tackling worldwide trade in stolen mobiles
New GSM Jammer Looks Like a GSM Cellphone
Sangyo 360 degree surveilance camera working with
3G phones
Bizarre Jamming Of Moldova GSM Network
Camera phones a threat to industrial secrets
US tower firm fined over safety violations
Mobile Phone whilst driving ban commences in the UK
Lawsuit over GSM network seizure in Cote d'Ivoire
African GSM Operators Create Mobile Phone EIR
Blacklist
Woman suffers facial burns from cell phone
Nigerian Regulator Sets Up Arbitration Panels Over GSM Complaints
Calif. bans mobile phone spam
Security Concerns Still Slowing Mobile App Deployment
DoCoMo Mova F505i wth fingerprint authentication technology
GSM Association sets its sights on spamming globally
Vodafone to clamp down on SMS Spam
GSM
Jammer
Security
Device
saved Pakistan's president
Worlds First Mobile Spyphone Launched
EU moves against illegal and harmful content online
Korean Government Admits Developing Anti-Tapping
South Korea
to introduce tougher Location laws |
|